Our primary rule is that the strength of a claim must not exceed the strength of the source. Government gazette, regulator/central-bank document, and competent authority record carry the highest weight for country law and policy. If there is a confirmed brand first-party source, it can be used to explain one's terms or feature claim, but self-published statistics are not considered facts without independent verification. Search results query demand indicates; it does not prove product availability, operator identity, or safety.
Before creating an article, query cluster, entity conflict, country context, high-impact claim, and user task are documented. The author starts with a direct answer, then provides brand-specific observation, in-depth explanation, action or evidence-preservation step, and a balanced conclusion. If using numbers related to bonus, app, payment, or security, effective date, method, and condition are required; otherwise, fixed figures are omitted. Legal articles are reviewed based on the current gazette and official summary.
Five questions are mandatory in the editorial review: whether domains with the same name have been confused; whether any unverified fact has gained promotional certainty; whether Bangladesh law has been updated in a timely manner; whether the public link is an approved source; and whether the conclusion mentions both advantages and limitations. Headlines do not use “official,” “best,” “safest,” or guaranteed outcome.
In case of conflict, we state the differences in claims, and do not choose a convenient number. The material correction page includes date and change summary. Opinion is not a substitute for evidence. Upon receiving reader complaints, operator statements, or new documents, source provenance is examined; payment, gift, or legal threat does not change factual standards. Editorial questions can be sent to -. [email protected]Can be sent to -.